Explore UCD

UCD Home >

POL30780

Academic Year 2026/2027

Justice in Education (POL30780)

Subject:
Politics
College:
Social Sciences & Law
School:
Politics & Int Relations
Level:
3 (Degree)
Credits:
10
Module Coordinator:
Dr Alexa Zellentin
Trimester:
Spring
Mode of Delivery:
On Campus
Internship Module:
No
How will I be graded?
Letter grades

Curricular information is subject to change.

We analyse moral questions in the context of education and schooling. In particular, we will look at the relevant criteria for evaluating the moral rights and duties of children, parents, and the state with regard to education. Students will be introduced to some of the most important concepts in political theory such as justice, equality, liberty, autonomy, and community. We will discuss the different aims of eduction as well as which agents have which responsibilities with regard to enabling children to acquire the capacities for full membership in society. We will consider which understandings of freedom and equality should inform our thinking about multicultural education and/or demands for equal opportunities for the socially disadvantaged and discuss whether and in how far state schools ought to be neutral with regard to religious and/or cultural norms relating to conceptions of the good life.

About this Module

Learning Outcomes:

On completion of this module you should be able to:
• read and critically engage with the literature on justice in education in moral, political, and legal theory
• explain key concerns and debates regarding social justice, aims the aims of education, rights and duties of different stake-holders and diversity in educa-tion
• distinguish between the normative, conceptual, and empirical background assumptions of claims about justice in education
• analyse, criticise, evaluate, and justify moral demands relating to justice in education
• develop informed arguments for taking one or another particular position on controversial issues regarding justice in education
• collaborate with a diverse group of peers on exercises relating to justice in education

Indicative Module Content:

Some of the questions we discuss will be
• What do we mean by justice in education?
• Which theories of social justice are most convincing?
• What exactly is bad about unequal chances?
• What are the aims of education?
• When is legitimate for the state to force us to do/not do something?
• Who should have the last word in disputes about education?
• How should we deal with diversity?
• Should teaching be neutral?
• Should teaching be multicultural?
• What exactly do we value about liberty?
• Do children have a right to an open future?
• What kind of equality matters?
• What kind of equality in education do we really want?
• What rights to parents have?
• Are parents allowed to shape their children's worldview?
• Should "ethos" be allowed to make a difference to education?

UNESCO highlights a set of key competencies that support individuals in their development and support society in achieving the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). UCD has adapted these competencies and is combining them with others to form a general framework of learning competencies. This module will help you develop the competencies below to the levels specified. 
Learning Competency Additional Information Level

Collaboration

The ability to learn from others; to understand and respect the needs, perspectives and actions of others (empathy); to understand, relate to and be sensitive to others (empathic leadership); to deal with conflicts in a group; and to facilitate collaborative and participatory problem solving. Competent

Critical Thinking

The ability to question norms, practices and opinions; to reflect on one’s own values, perceptions and actions. Competent

Self-awareness

The ability to reflect on one’s own role in the local community and (global) society; to continually evaluate and further motivate one’s actions; and to deal with one’s feelings and desires. Competent

Normative

The ability to understand and reflect on the norms and values that underlie one’s actions; and to negotiate values, principles, goals, and targets, in a context of conflicts of interest and trade-offs, uncertain knowledge and contradictions. Competent

Wellbeing

Wellbeing is having the resources and skills to meet life's challenges, including attributes such as personal development skills, resilience, stress management, strengths, lifestyle skills, nutrition, physical activity, sleep, alcohol/substance use, academic skills, time management, goal setting, interpersonal skills, group work, communication. Competent

The United Nations identified seventeen Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) as core to the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, and UCD contributes in general to SDG 4 Quality Education. Further SDGs explored within this module if relevant are listed below. A scale of 1 - 5 indicates the extent to which the SDG is covered.


 

Student Effort Hours:
Student Effort Type Hours
Autonomous Student Learning

203

Lectures

22

Total

225


Approaches to Teaching and Learning:
The best way to learn philosophy is to philosophise, that is, having a debate putting forward our strongest arguments and carefully considering the objections of our interlocutors, refining our reasoning and engaging again with critics… Part of the job is questioning our own views and double-checking our intuitions. Think Socratic method. However, before developing a normative judgement that can be well defended one needs to know at least some of the relevant theory. Your learning in this module thus involves different activities and sources.
Readings
The readings selected for this module are mostly original contributions to the normative political theory literature rather than textbooks explaining ideas and traditions. The class schedule below sets out the required readings for each session.
All required readings must be completed before the class for which they are assigned.
Handouts
There are thematic handouts on key issues and themes of the module. These summarise important definitions, distinctions, and questions on the topic in question. It might be helpful to have the handout at hand while doing the readings.
Classes
This class is meant to be conducted in seminar style. There will be no lectures summarising the readings. Instead, students are expected to come prepared and to initiate in-class discussion by bringing up their questions and concerns. Questions of understanding are particularly welcome, since the readings are contributions to debates and it cannot be expected that students understand the implications of the specific background.
There usually will be an introduction of central themes supported by slides, but students are always invited to bring up questions and ideas that might lead to another focus. Classes provide room for active learning, that is for trying out your ideas on the issue. You are expected to come prepared to discuss the ideas discussed and arguments made in the required readings.
There is an in-class exercise for each weak which counts towards the active participation grade which accounts for 10% of the overall grade.
Questions
Philosophical issues are by their nature puzzling, so please expect to be puzzled a lot during this module, probably even confused. If you do not have questions, you are doing it wrong! Please make sure to note down any questions you have on the readings, the handouts, and the lectures and to let me know about them: I will work any such queries into the plan for the next class. Please remember to note the page number for any unclear passages.
Where you want a direct and personal response, please sign up for a slot during my office hour.
Writing
Your grade in this module depends largely on a written assignment, so please practice writing as much as you can. It will be extremely helpful to make notes while reading relevant literature. Please remember to also note down your questions as well as any insights you gained during classroom discussions.
While you take notes, please remember to note down the relevant page numbers as for this module all references to particular claims in the literature (be it in form of direct quotations or simply in form of referring to an idea discussed by another author) must be accompanied by a properly formatted in-text reference that includes the relevant page number.

Requirements, Exclusions and Recommendations
Learning Requirements:

Students should be familiar with the basic argumentative techniques used in normative political theory and/or moral and political philosophy.

Learning Recommendations:

Familiarity with key theories of social justice is highly recommended.
To get a head start for this module, you might want to read: Swift, Adam (2019) Political Philosophy. A Beginners' Guide for Students and Politicians, 4th ed., Cambridge: Polity Press.


Module Requisites and Incompatibles
Equivalents:
Justice in Education (POL30370)


 

Assessment Strategy
Description Timing Component Scale Must Pass Component % of Final Grade In Module Component Repeat Offered
Assignment(Including Essay): 3000 words normative political theory essay. Week 15 Graded No
51
No
Participation in Learning Activities: Contribution to in-class discussions and exercises Week 1, Week 2, Week 3, Week 4, Week 5, Week 6, Week 7, Week 8, Week 9, Week 10, Week 11, Week 12 Standard conversion grade scale 40% No
10
No
Quizzes/Short Exercises: Preparatory exercises for term project. Week 4, Week 7, Week 10 Standard conversion grade scale 40% No
15
No
Quizzes/Short Exercises: Quiz on the required readings for the week to come. Week 1, Week 2, Week 3, Week 4, Week 5, Week 6, Week 7, Week 8, Week 9, Week 10, Week 11, Week 12 Standard conversion grade scale 40% No
24
No

As part of UCD's student support, under the Additional Consideration policy, extensions may be available for the following assessments in the module: Assignment (including essay/poster), Portfolio, Reflective Assignment, Report(s), and Individual Project.


Carry forward of passed components
No
 

Resit In Terminal Exam
Summer No
Please see Student Jargon Buster for more information about remediation types and timing. 

Feedback Strategy/Strategies

• Feedback individually to students, post-assessment
• Group/class feedback, post-assessment
• Online automated feedback

How will my Feedback be Delivered?

Group/class Feedback, pre-assessment in terms of detailed rubric Feedback individually to students, post-assessment, with reference to rubric Group/class feedback, post-assessment In line with university policy students will be provided with feedback within 20 days of the deadline for submitting the assignment.

Biesta, Gert (2017). The Rediscovery of Teaching. Routledge. (371.102 BIE / UCD e-book)
Brighouse, Harry and Swift, Adam (2006). Parents’ rights and the value of the family. Ethics, 117 (1), 80–108. (UCD e-journal)
Brighouse, Harry, Ladd, Helen F., Loeb, Susanna and Swift, Adam (2018). Educational Goods - Values, Evidence, and Decision-Making. The University of Chicago Press. (UCD e-book)
Clayton, Matthew (2012). The Case against the comprehensive enrolment of children. Journal of Political Philosophy, 20 (3), 353-364. (UCD e-journal)
Curren, Randall (2009). Education as a social right in a diverse society. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 43 (1), 45-56. (UCD e-journal)
Dietrich, Frank (2022). Critical reflection and the limits of parental authority. Journal of Applied Philosophy, 39 (4), 562-580. (UCD e-journal)
Driver, Julia (2007). Ethics: the Fundamentals. Blackwell. (170 DRI)
Feinberg, Joel (2007). The child's right to an open future. In: Philosophy of Education. An Anthology edited by Curren, Randall, 112-123, Blackwell. (370.1 CUR).
This is a reprint of Feinberg, Joel (1980). The child's right to an open future. In his Freedom and Fulfillment: Philosophical Essays, Princeton University Press.
Gutmann, Amy (2003). The authority and responsibility to educate. In: A Companion to the Philosophy of Education edited by Curren, Randall, 397-411, Blackwell. (UCD e-book).
This is a reprint of Gutmann, Amy (1987). Democratic Education. Princeton University Press. (370.973 GUT), Chapter 1: States and education
Lazenby, Hugh (2016). What is equality of opportunity in education? Theory and Research in Education, 14 (1), 65-76. (UCD e-journals)
MacMullen, Ian (2018). Religious schools, civic Education, and public policy: A framework for evaluation and decision. Theory and Research in Education, 16 (2), 141-161. (UCD e-journal)
Martinich, A. P. (various editions). Philosophical Writing: An Introduction. Blackwell. (808.06661 MAR slc)
Merry, Michael S. (2018). Indoctrination, Islamic schools, and the broader scope of harm. Theory and Research in Education, 16 (2), 162-178. (UCD e-journal)
Meyer, Kirsten (2016). Why should we demand equality of educational opportunity? Theory and Research in Education, 14 (3), 333-347. (UCD e-journals)
Mills, Claudia (2003). The child's right to an open future? Journal of Social Philosophy, 34 (4), 499–509. (UCD e-journal)
Moschella, Melissa (2014). Natural law, parental rights and education policy. The American Journal of Jurisprudence, 59 (2), 197-227. (UCD e-journal)
Pavel, Sonia Maria and Cynamon, Jeremy Kingston (2025). Your home is not a school: The limits of homeschooling as a political practice. Politics, Philosophy & Economics, 10.1177/1470594x251335855 (online first). (UCD e-journal)
Sardoc, Mitja (2018). Democratic Education at 30: An interview with Dr. Amy Gutmann. Theory and Research in Education, 16 (2), 244-252. (UCD e-journal)
Schinkel, Anders, de Ruyter, Doret and Steutel, Jan (2010). Threats to autonomy in consumer societies and their implications for education. Theory and Research in Education, 8 (3), 269-287. (UCD e-journal)
Weinstein, Jack Russel (2004). Neutrality, pluralism, and education: Civic education as learning about the other. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 23 (4), 235-263. (UCD e-journal)
Robeyns, Ingrid (2006). Three Models of Education: Rights, Capabilities and Human Capital. Theory and Research in Education, 4 (1), 69-84. (UCD e-journals)

Timetabling information is displayed only for guidance purposes, relates to the current Academic Year only and is subject to change.
Spring Lecture Offering 1 Week(s) - 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33 Thurs 09:00 - 10:50