Explore UCD

UCD Home >

PHYS40300

Academic Year 2024/2025

Narrative Literature Review (PHYS40300)

Subject:
Physiology
College:
Health & Agricultural Sciences
School:
Medicine
Level:
4 (Masters)
Credits:
10
Module Coordinator:
Assoc Professor John Baugh
Credit Split by Trimester:
Autumn 5
Spring 5
Trimester:
2 Trimester duration (Aut-Spr)
Mode of Delivery:
On Campus
Internship Module:
No
How will I be graded?
Letter grades

Curricular information is subject to change.

The objective of this module is to write a critical review of a selection of scientific publications. If this module is being taken as part of the Taught MSc in Experimental Physiology students will be asked to work with their lab supervisor to pick a topic that complements the work of the research group and relates to the major research project that will be conducted in the Summer trimester.

While it is not expected that this review is an exhaustive systematic review of all available literature when conducting a narrative review students should take care to be critical and unbiased.

A narrative literature review should be a comprehensive, critical and objective analysis of the current knowledge on a topic.

Conducting such a review is an essential part of the research process and helps to establish a theoretical framework and focus or context for your research. A literature review will help identify scientific evidence that supports and contextualises your planned experiments. A detailed literature review will help lead you to a sufficiently focused research question that justifies your research.

About this Module

Learning Outcomes:

Conducting a literature review helps students achieve several key learning objectives:

1. Understanding Existing Research: Students become familiar with the current state of research in their field, including major theories, methodologies, and findings.

2. Critical Thinking: By evaluating and synthesizing various sources, students develop critical thinking skills. They learn to identify strengths, weaknesses, and gaps in the existing literature.

3. Research Skills: Students enhance their ability to locate, analyse, and organize information from diverse sources. This includes developing effective search strategies and using academic databases.

4. Theoretical Framework Development: Literature reviews help students build a theoretical framework for their own research. They learn to position their work within the broader academic context and identify how their research can contribute to ongoing debates.

5. Academic Writing: Writing a literature review improves students' academic writing skills. They learn to summarize complex information clearly and concisely, and to present their own analysis and arguments effectively.

6. Identifying Research Gaps: Students learn to spot gaps in the existing research, which can help them formulate new research questions and hypotheses.

7. Methodological Insights: By reviewing various studies, students gain insights into different research methodologies and their applications, helping them design their own studies more effectively.

Student Effort Hours:
Student Effort Type Hours
Autonomous Student Learning

200

Project Supervision

24

Total

224


Approaches to Teaching and Learning:
In week one of the Autumn trimester students will be assigned to host laboratories under the guidance of a research-active Principle Investigator (PI). The PI will act as a mentor for this assignment and suggest suitable research topics for your experimental work that will follow in the Summer trimester. The objective of this assignment is to write a literature review that supports your experimental plans.

In addition to mentorship that will be provided by your research group PI students will utilise UCD Library resources that provide training in database searching, academic writing, and the use of Endnote. Students will also be supported by regular tutorials.

Requirements, Exclusions and Recommendations

Not applicable to this module.


Module Requisites and Incompatibles
Not applicable to this module.
 

Assessment Strategy
Description Timing Component Scale Must Pass Component % of Final Grade In Module Component Repeat Offered
Assignment(Including Essay): Project-relevant literature review. Week 12 Spring Graded No
100
No

Carry forward of passed components
No
 

Remediation Type Remediation Timing
In-Module Resit Prior to relevant Programme Exam Board
Please see Student Jargon Buster for more information about remediation types and timing. 

Feedback Strategy/Strategies

• Feedback individually to students, on an activity or draft prior to summative assessment
• Feedback individually to students, post-assessment

How will my Feedback be Delivered?

Written feedback on drafts and final submission will be provided to student.