Explore UCD

UCD Home >

PHIL41510

Academic Year 2025/2026

Ethics in Public Life (PHIL41510)

Subject:
Philosophy
College:
Social Sciences & Law
School:
Philosophy
Level:
4 (Masters)
Credits:
10
Module Coordinator:
Dr Leda Berio
Trimester:
Autumn
Mode of Delivery:
On Campus
Internship Module:
No
How will I be graded?
Letter grades

Curricular information is subject to change.

How does technology affect the way we interact with each other and conceptualize and perceive ourselves? Can technological use make us better or worse moral agents, friends, partners, or make for better or worse institutions or workplaces, and what sort of transformations can technological tools bring in domains we think are important for human flourishing, such as social relationships and health care?

This module will tackle these and similar questions and will introduce students to contemporary ethical challenges posed by our increasing reliance on technologies such as AI, robots, and social media. We will start with general considerations on what sort of issues new technology present to us, including the development of our virtues, choices in ethical framework, and responsibility gaps. Then, we will look at what effects social media, AI, and robotics can have on our relationships with others and ourselves, as well as professional life. In the second part of the module, we will focus on these effects in health care specifically. We will discuss these topics through specific case studies, as well as bioethics and philosophy texts.


About this Module

Learning Outcomes:

On successful completion of the course students will have a grasp of the some of the most important theoretical frameworks for our ethical thinking. They will be able to construct their own lines of argument concerning these frameworks. They will be able to critically assess some of the most important contributions to these debates in the philosophical literature. They will have an understanding of how these frameworks are applied in practical contexts. They will have a detailed understanding of the issues involved in thinking abput a range of practical ethical issues.

Indicative Module Content:

How does technology affect the way we interact with each other and conceptualize and perceive ourselves? Can technological use make us better or worse moral agents, friends, partners, or institutions or workplaces, and what sort of transformations can technological tools bring in domains we think are important for human flourishing, such as social relationships and health care?

This module will tackle these and similar questions and will introduce students to contemporary ethical challenges posed by our increasing reliance on technologies such as AI, robots, and social media. We will start with general considerations on what sort of issues new technology present to us, including the development of our virtues, choices in ethical framework, and responsibility gaps. Then, we will look at what effects social media, AI, and robotics can have on our relationships with others and ourselves, as well as professional life. In the second part of the module, we will focus on these effects in health care specifically. We will discuss these topics through specific case studies, as well as bioethics and philosophy texts.

Student Effort Hours:
Student Effort Type Hours
Seminar (or Webinar)

24

Autonomous Student Learning

226

Total

250


Approaches to Teaching and Learning:
Two-hour seminars with lecturer presentation, student presentation and class participation.

Please note, according to the UCD Generative AI Use in Module Assignments Traffic Light Warning System, the assignments in this module will adhere to the Amber Warning Light System. This means you may only use generative Al for assignments in this module for certain purposes only and only under the guidance of your module coordinator and within academic integrity guidelines. (‘Amber’)

Requirements, Exclusions and Recommendations

Not applicable to this module.


Module Requisites and Incompatibles
Not applicable to this module.
 

Assessment Strategy
Description Timing Component Scale Must Pass Component % of Final Grade In Module Component Repeat Offered
Assignment(Including Essay): First Essay Week 8 Graded Yes
25
Yes
Assignment(Including Essay): Final Essay Week 14 Graded Yes
60
Yes
Participation in Learning Activities: Presentation in Class on a designated date. One presentation for each participant on one selected week. Week 2, Week 3, Week 4, Week 5, Week 6, Week 7, Week 8, Week 9, Week 10, Week 11, Week 12 Graded No
15
No

Carry forward of passed components
No
 

Resit In Terminal Exam
Spring No
Please see Student Jargon Buster for more information about remediation types and timing. 

Feedback Strategy/Strategies

• Feedback individually to students, post-assessment
• Group/class feedback, post-assessment

How will my Feedback be Delivered?

Verbal feedback on individual presentations and to the class giving general advice after the first essay. Comments and grade provided on first essay within two weeks of submission and comments and grade provided on final essay at the end of the module.

Name Role
Dr Leda Berio Lecturer / Co-Lecturer
Dr Silvia Ivani Lecturer / Co-Lecturer
Assoc Professor Danielle Petherbridge Lecturer / Co-Lecturer

Timetabling information is displayed only for guidance purposes, relates to the current Academic Year only and is subject to change.
Autumn Seminar Offering 1 Week(s) - Autumn: All Weeks Wed 18:00 - 19:50