Explore UCD

UCD Home >

NMHS44020

Academic Year 2024/2025

Evid synthesis & translation (NMHS44020)

Subject:
Nursing,Midwifery & Health Sys
College:
Health & Agricultural Sciences
School:
Nursing,Midwifery & Health Sys
Level:
4 (Masters)
Credits:
30
Module Coordinator:
Dr Deirdre O'Donnell
Credit Split by Trimester:
Autumn 10
Spring 20
Trimester:
2 Trimester duration (Aut-Spr)
Mode of Delivery:
Blended
Internship Module:
No
Module Type:
Research/Capstone Module
How will I be graded?
Letter grades

Curricular information is subject to change.

Evidence-Based-Practice and related policymaking (EBP) describes clinical practice and health policy that is grounded in the best currently available scientific knowledge (research evidence) while considering the preferences of the patient/client, professional clinical knowledge and practice and policy contexts. This module focuses on the principles of EBP and their application in the contexts of nursing, midwifery, and health systems.

The module aims to support students in developing knowledge and skills in evidence synthesis and translating evidence into practice and policy. These capabilities are critical to better quality, safe, and personalised healthcare.

Through the guided research project (dissertation) process, students engage in a professional practice or policy issue, formulate a research question, and acquire the available research evidence and Clinical Practice Guidelines. Students develop knowledge of appropriate critical appraisal concepts and frameworks and apply this knowledge to existing research evidence. Students synthesise and report on the findings and develop a plan for translation to practice or policy. This translation plan draws on theories of systems thinking, implementation science, and collaborative stakeholder engagement.

About this Module

Learning Outcomes:

Explain the relationship between research and Evidence Based Practice or Policy.

Critically reflect and examine on how Systems Thinking, Implementation Science, and stakeholder engagement can support evidence translation in healthcare and policy.

Critically reflect on and assess one’s practice or policy context in consultation with stakeholders and a scoping literature review.

Formulate a problem statement and design a research question to address a practice or policy knowledge gap.

Explain the rationale for the ranking of different study designs on evidence hierarchies aligned to different types of research questions.

Plan, conduct and document a systematic search strategy to acquire appropriate research evidence corresponding to the research question.

Critically appraise and evaluate the integrity of the research evidence and judge the value of the findings.

Synthesise the evidence and interpret the results explaining how the grade and certainty of the evidence informs decision-making.

Determine what the implications of the findings are for practice or policy and integrate them into a plan for evidence generation and/or translation.

Indicative Module Content:

• Understanding the relationship between research and Evidence-based-Practice or Policy
• Systems Thinking, Implementation Science, and Stakeholder Engagement for evidence translation
• Formulating structured research questions
• Research paradigms and designs
• Developing systematic search strategies for acquiring research evidence
• Evidence hierarchies and research designs
• Critical appraisal of research evidence and Clinical Practice Guidelines.
• Development of an evidence-informed Implementation plan.



Student Effort Hours:
Student Effort Type Hours
Autonomous Student Learning

670

Lectures

14

Small Group

15

Seminar (or Webinar)

20

Project Supervision

40

Total

759


Approaches to Teaching and Learning:
• Our teaching and learning approaches aim to promote student-led active learning and use inquiry-based and authentic learning. Teaching strategies encourage engagement, motivation, confidence building and deep learning.
• Students are engaged in a project that involves exploring a clinical topic from their practice setting and develop a problem statement, research questions and appropriate solutions.
• Students are scaffolded in theoretical, conceptual development and methodology using recorded lectures, student-centred participatory and interactive seminars and academic supervision.
• Collaborative learning is fostered by interprofessional (peer) dialogue and critical reflection (tutorials) from a variety of midwifery and nursing settings
• Online learning mechanisms are fostered through discussion forums to facilitate question‐posing, peer‐assessing, and learning.
• Learning is deepened by applying tools and conducting a systematic search strategy and critical appraisal.
• The module is delivered over two academic trimesters using blended face-to-face and online synchronous and asynchronous learning.

Requirements, Exclusions and Recommendations

Not applicable to this module.


Module Requisites and Incompatibles
Not applicable to this module.
 

Assessment Strategy
Description Timing Component Scale Must Pass Component % of Final Grade In Module Component Repeat Offered
Assignment(Including Essay): The students are required to provide a 2-minute oral pitch, which will support the development of a written assignment outlining the problem statement, research question and systematic search strategy Week 11 Autumn Alternative non-linear conversion grade scale 50% No
10
No
Thesis/Dissertation: Students submit a dissertation based on evidence synthesis and translation project. Week 15 Spring Alternative non-linear conversion grade scale 50% No
90
No

Carry forward of passed components
Yes
 

Remediation Type Remediation Timing
Repeat Within Two Trimesters
Please see Student Jargon Buster for more information about remediation types and timing. 

Feedback Strategy/Strategies

• Feedback individually to students, on an activity or draft prior to summative assessment
• Group/class feedback, post-assessment
• Peer review activities

How will my Feedback be Delivered?

• Active feedback is provided in response to student-led assessment queries on the online ask-a-question forum. Lecturers offer several mechanisms for live interactive feedback through online workshops and breakout sessions. • Individual written feedback will be provided following submission and grading of assignment 1. This feedback will feedforward for the summative assessment on key concepts related to ' Research question' 'Search Strategy'. Collective feedback on key themes is provided to the class regularly. • All dissertation chapters have formative feedback supported by academic supervision. Each chapter has a rubric developed to enhance feedback.

Selected reading
More extensive readings are provided through the module in Brightspace.

Barker, J., Linsley, P., Kane, R. (2016) Evidence-Based Practice for Nurses and Healthcare Professionals. 3rd edn. London: SAGE.

Brown, C. E., Kim, S. C., Stichler, J. F., & Fields, W. (2010). Predictors of knowledge, attitudes, use and future use of evidence-based practice among baccalaureate nursing students at two universities. Nurse Education Today, 30(6), 521-527. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2009.10.021

Caldwell, K., Coleman, K., Copp, G., Bell, L., & Ghazi, F. (2007). Preparing for professional practice: How well does professional training equip health and social care practitioners to engage in evidence-based practice? Nurse Education Today, 27(6), 518-528. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2006.08.014

Clark, A. M. (2013). Getting streetwise: A metaphor for empowering nurses for evidence-based practice. Nurse Education Today, 33(1), 3-4. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2012.08.010

Curtis, K., Fry, M., Shaban, R. Z., & Considine, J. (2017). Translating research findings to clinical nursing practice. Journal of clinical nursing, 26(5-6), 862–872. doi:10.1111/jocn.13586

Ellis, P. (2019) Evidence-based Practice in Nursing. 4th edn. London: SAGE
Lehane, E., Agreli, H., O’ Connor, S., Hegarty, J., Leahy-Warren, P., Bennet, D., Blake, C., Burke, F., Corrigan, M., Drennan, J., Hayes, M., Heffernan, E., Horgan, F., Lynch, H., McVeigh, J., Müller, N., O’ Keeffe, E., O’ Tuathaigh, C., Sahm, L. and Savage, E. (2018). Development of a Competency Framework for Clinical Effectiveness Education in Ireland. Report prepared for Department of Health, Clinical Effectiveness Unit, National Patient Safety Office, Ireland.
Available At: https://health.gov.ie/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/Competency-Framework-clinical-effectiveness-education-Dec-2018.pdf

Makic, M. B. F., Martin, S. A., Burns, S., Philbrick, D., & Rauen, C. (2013). Putting Evidence Into Nursing Practice: Four Traditional Practices Not Supported by the Evidence. [Article]. Critical Care Nurse, 33(2), 28-44. DOI: 10.4037/ccn2013787

Name Role
Dr Andrew Darley Lecturer / Co-Lecturer
Dr Carmel Davies Lecturer / Co-Lecturer
Dr Bridget Johnston Lecturer / Co-Lecturer
Professor Corina Naughton Lecturer / Co-Lecturer
Dr Deirdre O'Donnell Lecturer / Co-Lecturer

Timetabling information is displayed only for guidance purposes, relates to the current Academic Year only and is subject to change.
2 Trimester (Sep-May) Lecture Offering 50 Week(s) - 2 Mon 14:00 - 15:50
2 Trimester (Sep-May) Lecture Offering 50 Week(s) - 24 Mon 14:00 - 15:50
2 Trimester (Sep-May) Online Learning Offering 50 Week(s) - 6, 12, 21, 25, 31 Mon 14:00 - 15:50
2 Trimester (Sep-May) Online Learning Offering 50 Week(s) - 1, 3, 4, 7, 8, 10, 11, 30 Mon 14:00 - 16:50
2 Trimester (Sep-May) Lecture Offering 50 Week(s) - 20, 29 Mon 14:00 - 16:50
2 Trimester (Sep-May) Online Learning Offering 50 Week(s) - 23, 26 Mon 14:00 - 16:50
2 Trimester (Sep-May) Tutorial Offering 50 Week(s) - 5 Mon 14:00 - 16:50
2 Trimester (Sep-May) Lecture Offering 50 Week(s) - 9 Mon 14:00 - 16:50