LAW37620

Learning Outcomes:

By the end of this module you should be able to:

1. Differentiate between legal and illegal expressions according to various international, European, and/or national standards, and different factual situations.
2. Analyse key legislation and case-law from different jurisdictions concerning free speech, hate speech and incitement to violence or discrimination.
3. Assess and compare the regulatory approach of different jurisdictions to address hate speech and related issues and the links between different regulatory approaches and underlying socio-cultural issues.
4. Critically analyse judgments dealing with free speech, hate speech and incitement to violence or discrimination issues.

Indicative Module Content:

This module will cover the following topics:

1. Introduction to legal and illegal expression

2. Hate speech and incitement to violence: The approach of the European Court of Human Rights

3. Hate speech and incitement to violence: The EU approach

5. The regulatory challenges posed by online hate speech

Please note that the order of the topics covered, and the topics themselves, are subject to changes.

Student Effort Hours:

Approaches to Teaching and Learning:

Learning activities include:

-Interactive seminars
-Accessing resources
-Individual study (e.g. preparing for lectures in advance)
-Self-directed research
-Problem solving
-Debates
-Case note reading and writing
-Group projects
-Use of audiovisual tools

Students in this module are expected to have read and understood the UCD Academic Integrity Policy and the School Protocol on Academic Integrity. Students must ensure that they comply with all requirements laid down therein and avoid academic misconduct. Students are not permitted to use generative artificial intelligence, or other machine learning technology, to learn and complete assessments on this module. Students are expected to follow OSCOLA Ireland in citing sources in completing assessments.

Requirements, Exclusions and Recommendations

Learning Recommendations:

For non-law students, it is strongly recommended to pass the module "LAW10450 Law and Courts" before taking this module.

If this is not the case (e.g. because they are international students), they should at least be able to read a judgment and understand basic legal terminology and jargon used in judgments.

Module Requisites and Incompatibles

Not applicable to this module.
 

Assessment Strategy

 

Please see Student Jargon Buster for more information about remediation types and timing. 

Feedback Strategy/Strategies

• Feedback individually to students, on an activity or draft prior to summative assessment
• Feedback individually to students, post-assessment
• Group/class feedback, post-assessment
• Online automated feedback
• Self-assessment activities

How will my Feedback be Delivered?

-During seminars, you will be offered informal feedback during (orally), when asking questions or when replying to questions. -You will have the chance to engage in various online activities for which you will receive feedback (automated feedback) or you will be given materials to self-assess your progress. -In addition, you will receive formal feedback (in written) on at least two occasions: 1. You will be given individual feedback on your case note outline. 2. Post-examination (after the submission of your case note), class feedback will be posted on Brightspace (indicative, not full model answers).

There is not one single textbook that suits this module. However, there are a range of texts that will be used as basic sources for the module, and additional specific sources will be recommended for each specific topic.

The basic reading list includes:

• Howard, Erica. Freedom of expression and religious hate speech in Europe. (Routledge 2017)
• Belavusau, Uladzislau. Freedom of Speech. Importing European and US Constitutional Models in Transitional Democracies (Routledge 2013)
• Zeno-Zencovich, Vincenzo. Freedom of expression: A critical and comparative analysis. (Routledge 2008)
• Brown, Alex. Hate Speech Law (Routledge 2017)
• Heinze, Eric. Hate Speech and Democratic Citizenship Paperback (OUP 2017)
• Oppenheimer, David B., et al. Comparative Equality and Anti-Discrimination Law (Edward Elgar 2020) [Chapter 13]
• Strossen, Nadine. HATE: Why We Should Resist it With Free Speech, Not Censorship (Inalienable Rights) [OUP 2018]

Timetabling information is displayed only for guidance purposes, relates to the current Academic Year only and is subject to change.