Show/hide contentOpenClose All
Curricular information is subject to change
By the end of this module students should:
1. Have progressed significantly their Master's project.
2. Be familiar with basic qualitative and quantitative methods.
3. Understand research ethics as related to their project.
4. Have deepened their understanding of research design.
Development of a Research Agenda
Data analysis
Expert review
Seminar attendance and listening
Student Effort Type | Hours |
---|---|
Lectures | 10 |
Project Supervision | 15 |
Autonomous Student Learning | 100 |
Total | 125 |
Not applicable to this module.
Description | Timing | Component Scale | % of Final Grade | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Assignment: Attendance and participation in the School Seminar series and producing a critique of a presenters research design and approach (500 words). | Throughout the Trimester | n/a | Pass/Fail Grade Scale | No | 10 |
Assignment: Ethics forms to be submitted to supervisor (week 4). | Week 4 | n/a | Pass/Fail Grade Scale | No | 20 |
Assignment: This assignment is a 1000 word written update/proposal on the masters project to be submitted to the supervisor. | Week 9 | n/a | Pass/Fail Grade Scale | Yes | 70 |
Resit In | Terminal Exam |
---|---|
Autumn | No |
• Feedback individually to students, on an activity or draft prior to summative assessment
• Feedback individually to students, post-assessment
• Online automated feedback
Students will receive face-to-face feedback throughout the trimester from their project superviser. face-to-face feedback will also be provided to students on the other forms of continuous assessment, notably if a student is showing evidence for poor attendance on mandatory components such as seminar attendance and participation.
Name | Role |
---|---|
Professor Julien Mercille | Lecturer / Co-Lecturer |