Curricular information is subject to change.
On completion of this module, students will be able to:
- understand the fundamental principles of producing high quality scientific writing;
- use these principles to evaluate their own work and give formative feedback on peer-written work;
- write a scientific biological literature review on a given topic.
| Student Effort Type | Hours |
|---|---|
| Autonomous Student Learning | 113 |
| Lectures | 12 |
| Total | 125 |
Not applicable to this module.
| Description | Timing | Component Scale | % of Final Grade | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Assignment(Including Essay): Online writing exercises and peer review of the first 500 words of the literature review. | Week 4 | Graded | No | 20 |
No |
| Assignment(Including Essay): Submission of first 1000 words of literature review for grading and feedback from module co-ordinator. | Week 7 | Graded | No | 20 |
No |
| Assignment(Including Essay): Final 3000 word literature review | Week 12 | Graded | No | 60 |
No |
| Resit In | Terminal Exam |
|---|---|
| Spring | No |
• Feedback individually to students, post-assessment
• Group/class feedback, post-assessment
• Peer review activities
Feedback given by staff to individual students on both the initial draft version of first part of the literature review and the final graded version. Class feedback given by module co-ordinator on draft assignments to highlight common problems. Peer review feedback also given.
| Name | Role |
|---|---|
| Dr Jan-Robert Baars | Lecturer / Co-Lecturer |
| Assoc Professor Jens Carlsson | Lecturer / Co-Lecturer |
| Dr Joanna Kacprzyk | Lecturer / Co-Lecturer |
| Dr Adam Kane | Lecturer / Co-Lecturer |
| Dr Rainer Melzer | Lecturer / Co-Lecturer |
| Dr Paola Valentini | Lecturer / Co-Lecturer |