Show/hide contentOpenClose All
Curricular information is subject to change
On completion of this module students should be able to:
1. Demonstrate the ability to analyse and critically evaluate existing and historic buildings and environments and to use these as an active component in the design process.
2. Demonstrate the ability to apply critical and analytical thinking to the development of a series of projects, employing a range of work methods and techniques.
3. Demonstrate the ability to use design as a means of investigation and research.
4. Demonstrate the ability to critically evaluate issues of building construction, structure and materials and integrate them into a synthetic design proposal.
5. Demonstrate the ability to critically evaluate issues of environment and integrate them into a synthetic design proposal.
6. Demonstrate an ability to use a variety of representational skills as a means of investigation and research and to present and exhibit work coherently.
7. Demonstrate the ability to communicate, discuss, critique and reflect on your own work and the work of your peers.
Student Effort Type | Hours |
---|---|
Studio | 12 |
Specified Learning Activities | 288 |
Total | 300 |
Not applicable to this module.
Description | Timing | Component Scale | % of Final Grade | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Portfolio: All of the work completed throughout the module is to be submitted in a portfolio for assessment. | Coursework (End of Trimester) | n/a | Other | No | 100 |
Remediation Type | Remediation Timing |
---|---|
In-Module Resit | Prior to relevant Programme Exam Board |
• Feedback individually to students, on an activity or draft prior to summative assessment
• Feedback individually to students, post-assessment
Students are in weekly contact with their tutors in small group meetings. At these, student's work is discussed and summative feedback is provided that is focused on positively developing project ideas. It is not intended to grade ideas which are in the process of taking shape. Reviews are scheduled during the semester at which students will be given an indication of what development is required in the case of a project being underdeveloped. Written feedback is given after the Interim Review and after the final assessment.
Name | Role |
---|---|
Mr Paul Arnold | Lecturer / Co-Lecturer |
Ms Alice Clancy | Lecturer / Co-Lecturer |
Ms Denise Murray | Lecturer / Co-Lecturer |
Assoc Professor Michael Pike | Lecturer / Co-Lecturer |