Show/hide contentOpenClose All
Curricular information is subject to change
Learning Outcomes
On completion of this module students should be able to:
1. Demonstrate a developing ability to survey, research and analyse existing and historic buildings, landscapes and environments and to use the findings as an active component in the design process.
2. Demonstrate the ability to develop a project through an iterative and rigorous work process, employing analytical thinking and a range of work methods, techniques and scales.
3. Demonstrate the ability to make appropriate and well-considered design interventions in a specified context through the integration of function, form, space, and environment.
4. Demonstrate the ability to integrate building construction, structure and materials into a synthetic design proposal that at the same time acknowledges and compliments the natural environment.
5. Demonstrate the ability to integrate environmental issues and concerns into a synthetic design proposal across all scales.
6. Demonstrate an ability to use a variety of representational skills appropriate to the various stages of the design project and to present and exhibit work coherently.
7. Demonstrate the ability to communicate, discuss, critique and reflect on your own work and the work of your peers.
Student Effort Type | Hours |
---|---|
Studio | 272 |
Autonomous Student Learning | 88 |
Total | 360 |
A minimum of D- in ARCT20050 Architectural Design IV
Remediation Type | Remediation Timing |
---|---|
In-Module Resit | Prior to relevant Programme Exam Board |
• Feedback individually to students, post-assessment
Feedback Students are in weekly contact with their tutors in individual or small group meetings. At these, student's work is discussed and summative feedback is provided that is focused on positively developing project ideas. It is not intended to grade ideas which are in the process of taking shape. Reviews are scheduled during the semester at which students will be given an indication of what development is required in the case of a project being underdeveloped. Written feedback is given after the Interim Review and after the final assessment.
Name | Role |
---|---|
Mr Chris Boyle | Lecturer / Co-Lecturer |
Ms Phoebe Brady | Lecturer / Co-Lecturer |
Ms Nicci Brock | Lecturer / Co-Lecturer |
Mr Paul Durcan | Lecturer / Co-Lecturer |
Mr Thomas O'Brien | Lecturer / Co-Lecturer |
Mr Luis Pedro Pedro | Lecturer / Co-Lecturer |
Assoc Professor Michael Pike | Lecturer / Co-Lecturer |
Ms Ciara Reddy | Lecturer / Co-Lecturer |
Studio | Offering 1 | Week(s) - Autumn: All Weeks | Fri 09:00 - 12:50 |
Studio | Offering 1 | Week(s) - Autumn: All Weeks | Fri 14:00 - 17:50 |
Studio | Offering 1 | Week(s) - Autumn: All Weeks | Mon 14:00 - 17:50 |
Studio | Offering 1 | Week(s) - Autumn: All Weeks | Wed 14:00 - 17:50 |